Comments for Cooperation Today http://www.cooperationtoday.org Consulting Cooperation for the libraries of the Lewis & Clark, Lincoln Trail, Rolling Prairie, and Shawnee Library Systems Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:52:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Organization 2.0: Building the Participatory Library by Datherine http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2010/05/organization-2-0-building-the-participatory-library/comment-page-1/#comment-17963 Datherine Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:52:48 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2010/05/organization-2-0-building-the-participatory-library/#comment-17963 Your posting is abosluetly on the point! Your posting is abosluetly on the point!

]]> Comment on PLA awards nomination deadline approaching by Satchel http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2008/12/pla-awards-nomination-deadline-approaching/comment-page-1/#comment-17960 Satchel Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:47:12 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2008/12/pla-awards-nomination-deadline-approaching/#comment-17960 You make thngis so clear. Thanks for taking the time! You make thngis so clear. Thanks for taking the time!

]]> Comment on Delivery Subcommittee by Free Scrambled Picture with Friends http://www.cooperationtoday.org/systems/subcommittees/delivery-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-17697 Free Scrambled Picture with Friends Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:40:43 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/#comment-17697 A very ambitious game with lots of content and great gameplay.check this site.Download it at: bit.ly/freescrambledpictures A very ambitious game with lots of content and great gameplay.check this site.Download it at: bit.ly/freescrambledpictures

]]> Comment on FY 2011 Illinois Public Library Annual Report (IPLAR) by Beth Kent http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2011/01/fy-2011-illinois-public-library-annual-report-iplar/comment-page-1/#comment-8605 Beth Kent Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:30:01 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/?p=2105#comment-8605 Where are we supposed to send the two printed copies? I believe we used to take them to Lincoln Trail in previous years? I have mine ready but want to send it to the right place after all that work! Also, are we supposed to do an Annual Survery? Where are we supposed to send the two printed copies? I believe we used to take them to Lincoln Trail in previous years? I have mine ready but want to send it to the right place after all that work!

Also, are we supposed to do an Annual Survery?

]]> Comment on Youth Literature Festival Writing Contest by Nikki http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2011/02/youth-literature-festival-writing-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-6338 Nikki Mon, 25 Jul 2011 01:49:20 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/?p=2176#comment-6338 You're a real deep thinker. Thanks for saihnrg. You’re a real deep thinker. Thanks for saihnrg.

]]> Comment on Christmas presents 2.7 by Connie http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2008/12/christmas-presents-27/comment-page-1/#comment-6319 Connie Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:58:10 +0000 http://conduit.lcls.org/?p=15#comment-6319 So true. Honesty and everything renocgized. So true. Honesty and everything renocgized.

]]> Comment on LIBRARY ASSOCIATE — ADULT SERVICES Zion-Benton Public Library by Githa http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2010/11/library-associate-adult-services-zion-benton-public-library/comment-page-1/#comment-6303 Githa Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:01:26 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/?p=2010#comment-6303 This site is like a calssoorm, except I don't hate it. lol This site is like a calssoorm, except I don’t hate it. lol

]]> Comment on Agenda Posted for IHLS Transition Board Meeting for 06.09.2011 by Janet Howard http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2011/06/agenda-posted-for-ihls-transition-board-meeting-for-06-09-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-3706 Janet Howard Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:01:31 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/?p=2462#comment-3706 I know LLSAP funding is just one part of everything that needs to be decided upon for the new system. I think, however, that this is the wrong way to set out on our new "joint" venture. Are we going to be equal partners, or are some going to be more equal than others? If these numbers are not the final one, then why not make the percentage numbers the same or simply say that the transitional board was unable to develope a uniform formula before July 1,2011. I know LLSAP funding is just one part of everything that needs to be decided upon for the new system. I think, however, that this is the wrong way to set out on our new “joint” venture.
Are we going to be equal partners, or are some going to be more equal than others?
If these numbers are not the final one, then why not make the percentage numbers the same or simply say that the transitional board was unable to develope a uniform formula before July 1,2011.

]]> Comment on Transition Board by Jim Roeckeman http://www.cooperationtoday.org/transition-board/comment-page-1/#comment-3699 Jim Roeckeman Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:56:49 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/?page_id=2325#comment-3699 My comment is on the funding and I would like to see a more equitable funding for the new system. Lewis and Clark will be bearing a greater burden and I hope the interim board can resolve this issue. I have to work till six tonight so I cannot be in Effingham. So I hope you can resolve this issue amicably. My comment is on the funding and I would like to see a more equitable funding for the new system. Lewis and Clark will be bearing a greater burden and I hope the interim board can resolve this issue.
I have to work till six tonight so I cannot be in Effingham. So I hope you can resolve this issue amicably.

]]> Comment on Agenda Posted for IHLS Transition Board Meeting for 06.09.2011 by Cindy Spencer http://www.cooperationtoday.org/2011/06/agenda-posted-for-ihls-transition-board-meeting-for-06-09-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-3696 Cindy Spencer Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:45:36 +0000 http://www.cooperationtoday.org/?p=2462#comment-3696 Hello, I have to agree with the other two librarians' posts regarding funding for the LLSAPS. If we are to be one organization, then monetary obligations for funding the LLSAPS needs to be shared equally. By having different formulas for each "former" library system's LLSAP, we are not moving forward with everyone as a equal partner. The committees have provided great leadership to this point and have attempted to see all points of view. I have high hopes that the new Board will continue with the same philosophies. But, by having different formulas for supporting the LLSAPS, it will not be possible for all entities to feel they are being treated in a fair manner. Hello,

I have to agree with the other two librarians’ posts regarding funding for the LLSAPS. If we are to be one organization, then monetary obligations for funding the LLSAPS needs to be shared equally. By having different formulas for each “former” library system’s LLSAP, we are not moving forward with everyone as a equal partner. The committees have provided great leadership to this point and have attempted to see all points of view. I have high hopes that the new Board will continue with the same philosophies. But, by having different formulas for supporting the LLSAPS, it will not be possible for all entities to feel they are being treated in a fair manner.

]]>