Delivery Subcommittee

April 12th, 2011 Leave a comment Go to comments

Delivery Subcommittee members are

This is where the Delivery Subcommittee posts their minutes.

  • 9.14.2010 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 10.8.2010 Working Group Conference Call Notes (PDF)
  • 10.11.2010 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 11.10.2010 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 11.29.2010 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 12.02.2010 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 12.20.2010 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 01.21.2011 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 02.03.2011 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 02.10.2011 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • 02.25-26.2011 Meeting Minutes (PDF)
  • Updated Delivery Standards (PDF) to be taken to the local system boards for endorsement and implementation.
  1. Cristy Stupegia
    December 21st, 2010 at 15:37 | #1

    First thank you for all of your hard work and for moving this process along in a professional manner.

    I would like to comment on fees on no key libraries. Recently, a library with no key had a delivery. Thru no fault of their own, the driver waited 30 to 45 minutes. No one showed at the library. Therefore the “no key” library’s patrons did not receive their materials plus it created a hardship for the other library users on the rest of the route. Our library had given up hope of receiving a delivery that day when the driver arrived late in the afternoon. With limited staff, we scrambled and tried to contact all of our users who had materials. The committee is proposing a fee for “no Key” libraries that do not have any one available for pick-ups. Our library users, staff, and I support a meaningful fee to be charged in the event a “no key” library has no one available. If you need help calculating a meaningful fee, please let me know. To all of those libraries that do not give a key to library systems for delivery, please be aware you are not only hurting your own patrons by not having staff available, but all of the patrons who remain on the rest of your route.

    Sincerely,
    Cristy Stupegia
    Sparta Public Library

  2. March 23rd, 2011 at 18:03 | #2

    The DOG system will be voluntary correct. Considering the amount of ILL’s that move through our desk on a daily basis there is no possibility of banding together all of one library’s items.

  3. Leslie Bednar
    March 23rd, 2011 at 20:36 | #3

    @Barbara Rhodes
    Good evening, Barbara,
    The delivery committee discussed this very question at our meeting in Effingham today! DOG (delivery on the go) is intended to move items to destination libraries following your library on a particular route. The idea is that those items will not first travel to the System headquarters to be sorted by staff and then delivered to the destination library the next day that library receives delivery.

    We recognize this is a small portion of the ILL that goes through your library. The remainder will be routed to System headquarters, sorted and sent to destination libraries. Delivery and sorting is a labor intensive process, and the committee has been looking for reasonable efficiencies within the process. The standards seek cooperation from member libraries and ask (when appropriate) that libraries bundle together items for the same destination library. There is no expectation that member libraries bundle all materials for each library, however if you have several similar items (i.e. paperbacks) going to the same destination it would be helpful if those items could be bundled together with rubber bands. Items prepared in this way do make the sorting process go much quicker, and will reduce the time needed to turn materials around for the next day of delivery.

    I hope this answers your question,
    Leslie

  4. February 9th, 2012 at 06:40 | #4

    A very ambitious game with lots of content and great gameplay.check this site.Download it at: bit.ly/freescrambledpictures

  1. November 12th, 2010 at 16:35 | #1
  2. December 9th, 2010 at 11:28 | #2
  3. January 5th, 2011 at 15:30 | #3